<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Testing on 0xcc.re</title>
    <link>https://0xcc.re/tags/testing/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Testing on 0xcc.re</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2018 13:36:20 +0200</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://0xcc.re/tags/testing/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>How to run 128 (testnet) I2P routers in multiple subnets on a single Linux system.</title>
      <link>https://0xcc.re/2018/10/16/howto-run-128-i2p-routers-in-multiple-subnets-on-a-single-linux-system.html</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2018 13:36:20 +0200</pubDate>
      <guid>https://0xcc.re/2018/10/16/howto-run-128-i2p-routers-in-multiple-subnets-on-a-single-linux-system.html</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;For a long time, at least internally it&amp;rsquo;s been talking about the need of a testnet for &lt;a href=&#34;https://geti2p.net/en/&#34;&gt;I2P&lt;/a&gt;. Testing in production isn&amp;rsquo;t trivial :)&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;ve been on and off the mission in quiet for myself for a while now, but finally completed something worty publishing, in other words a working testnet setup/teardown script. When I was thinking about the case two technologies comes to mind which might help getting the testnet idea an reality is &lt;a href=&#34;http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man8/ip-netns.8.html&#34;&gt;cgroups(namespaces)&lt;/a&gt; in Linux and &lt;a href=&#34;http://man.openbsd.org/rdomain.4&#34;&gt;rdomains&lt;/a&gt; in OpenBSD - both of them for network isolation and virtualization. It&amp;rsquo;s probably more as well, but it&amp;rsquo;s the ones I know of by the time of writing.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
